Future of Me

Future of Me

Future of Me

Turning Diagnostic Insights Into Actionable Self-Care

Turning Diagnostic Insights Into Actionable Self-Care

Turning Diagnostic Insights Into Actionable Self-Care

My role

Product Designer

Timeline

1 week

1500+ signups on launch day

1500+ signups

1500+ signups 

project-image
project-image
About

About

At the intersection of science and self-care, Future of Me helps you decode your external health story.

Through cutting-edge in-store scans that analyse your skin, hair, and body composition, the Future of Me Token gives you a personalised snapshot of where your health stands- and where it could go next.

Itโ€™s a system built to turn complex metrics into clarity, insight, and actionable next steps, helping you:

  • Understand what your skin, hair, and body are really trying to tell you

  • See how your biological health compares to others in your age group

  • Get matched with products, routines, and habits tailored to your unique blueprint

In a world of guesswork and generic advice, Future of Me puts science, precision, and you at the centre.

Customer journey mapping

Customer journey mapping

Pain points

Opportunities

The logo

The logo

The Future of Me logo consists of two elements:

  • The wordmark: โ€œFuture of Meโ€

  • The endorsement lock-up: โ€œpowered by Deep Holisticsโ€ with the DH monogram

Colours

Colours

Typeface

Typeface

Our typography consists of two font families, Satoshi and Playfair Display .

Satoshi
Satoshi
Regular
Medium
Italic
Medium Italic

Our primary font - modern, geometric, and effortlessly clear. It keeps things sharp, accessible, and always in focus.

Playfair Display
Playfair Display
Medium Italic

Our secondary font - classic with flair, used sparingly to spotlight titles or key phrases with elegance and punch.

Fallback font: Whenever itโ€™s not possible to use our font family, Satoshi could be replaced with Inter. Playfair Display is a Google font.

Ideation

Ideation

This is where it all begins โ€” letโ€™s go!

Complex to consumable
Complex to consumable

Complex to consumable

Before any design could begin, we were handed a reportโ€”dense, technical, and packed with scientific terms. To make sense of it, we took a deep-dive approach:

  • Collaborated with the team behind the analysis machine

  • Researched documentation and tutorials

  • Consulted our in-house doctors to understand the clinical significance of each parameter

Our goal was to decode the data into something usableโ€”for both us and the end user. We broke down the terms, restructured the flow, and created a simplified map of what each parameter meant, so it could later translate into design, content, and personalised recommendations.

project-image
project-image
Designing experience

Designing experience

Once we understood what the data was actually saying, we shifted our focus to how it should feel to the user.

We knew we were dealing with complex scientific insightsโ€”so the challenge became: how do we make this information personal, visual, and actionable?

We began by sketching possible layouts, experimenting ways on how do we highlight whatโ€™s good, bad, or โ€œneeds attentionโ€ without creating fear or confusion or overwhelmingness?

#phase_1

#phase_2

project-image
project-image

Alongside visual design, we also laid the foundation for how the report would be generated- thinking of it not as a static file, but a scalable, semi-automated system.

Analysing workflow and hiccups

Analysing workflow and hiccups

Last-Mile Delivery Friction

Last-Mile Delivery Friction

The original planโ€”a seamless dashboardโ€”had to be dropped early on. Instead, reports were manually exported to PDFs and passed to the sales team. This added steps, slowed delivery, and widened the gap between our promise and what was technically feasible.

Expectation of Instant Results

Expectation of Instant Results

Overwhelmed response. The promise was to deliver personalised reports within ten minutesโ€”but the system had to process dense biometric scans, fetch individual insights, match them to the right report format, and then send it out. This created a high-stakes bottleneck.

Volume vs. Manual Effort

Volume vs. Manual Effort

We aimed to deliver detailed reports within minutes of each scan, but the volume made manual work unsustainable.

Accuracy Under Pressure

Accuracy Under Pressure

Data bugs crept in. Backend glitches, design coordination, and dev dependencies all had to align in real time.

Bridging hardware and software

Bridging hardware and software

1.

1.

Aligning on Automation Early

Aligning on Automation Early

  • The goal was to minimise human errors and reduce back-and-forth.

  • Manual execution wasnโ€™t scalable- we needed automation from day one.

  • Worked closely with developers to build logic for bulk processing skin, hair, and body reports.

2.

2.

Visual Data Extraction with Precision

Visual Data Extraction with Precision

  • Marked exact coordinates (X, Y, width, height) for every image block in the scan reports.

  • Created a blueprint for developers to extract visuals via an image extractor tool.

  • Standardised the image pull process so design never needed to intervene manually.

3.

3.

Plugin-Driven Efficiency in Figma

Plugin-Driven Efficiency in Figma

  • Built a plugin-based flow where extracted images would auto-populate into the Figma report.

  • Enabled real-time batch updates for all visuals, overlays, graphs, and photos.

  • Drastically reduced design time, turning hours of work into minutes.

4.

4.

Parallel Automation for Data Population

Parallel Automation for Data Population

  • Data was populated using a similar logic- but under NDA constraints.

  • Faced bugs during initial testing where data didnโ€™t populate correctly.

  • Collaborated with backend to debug and refine data flow into the report templates.

Solutions

Solutions

One fix at a time.

#phase_2

#phase_1

project-image
project-image

#PHASE 3

Impact

Impact

1.

1.

Adoption

Adoption

  • ~30% of users lacked a skincare routine, showing clear need- a strong opportunity for first-time engagement.

  • Reports were seen as accurate and helpful, reflecting real conditions.

  • ~15% of users adopted recommended products- an encouraging start that validated user trust.

2.

2.

Business problems

Business problems

  • Manual execution wasnโ€™t scalable- we needed automation/dashboard from day one.

  • Users asked for more product options than what we suggested- a need for more flexible suggestion logic.

  • Retail staff offered conflicting advice, leading to confusion and rechecks at our kiosk.

This was just a quick peak ;)